Uncle Nearest receiver seeks to seal key report
7:13 p.m. Jan. 6, 2026
DUANE CROSS
MCO Publisher•Editor
The court-appointed receiver for Uncle Nearest Inc. has asked a federal judge to keep his second quarterly report confidential. He says making the report public could hurt efforts to refinance debt or sell company assets at what he calls a “critical juncture” in the receivership.
On Tuesday, Jan. 6, Receiver Phillip G. Young Jr. filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, asking to submit the report under seal. He is concerned that sharing sensitive financial and strategic information could hurt talks with potential buyers or lenders and lower the company’s value. The case, brought by Farm Credit Mid-America, has put Uncle Nearest and related companies under federal receivership while the court reviews their finances and future.
The filing says Young believes sealing the report will not affect due process, since the court and all parties involved will still have full access. He argues that quarterly reports are meant to inform the court and litigants, not competitors, investors, or the public. He warns that sharing too much could “chill” refinancing talks or efforts to sell assets.
The motion also mentions that future lawsuits could arise from the receivership. It says sharing investigative findings or possible claims too soon could hurt the company’s value. Young says he must look into all possible legal actions for the company, but believes making details public now could be more harmful than helpful.
Judge: Clearer, Stricter Deadlines
The request to seal the report was made on the same day the court issued a separate order about missed reporting deadlines. Judge Charles E. Atchley Jr. said the receiver was not to blame for the late second quarterly report, but stressed the need for clearer, stricter deadlines. The court set firm deadlines for future reports and told the receiver to explain why a required 30-day status report was not filed.
Judge Atchley ordered the receiver to file a status report by Jan. 13, stating when the second quarterly report would be ready. He also told the receiver to explain by Jan. 20 why he did not follow a previous order that required monthly updates on compliance with a schedule set in October.
At the same time, a group of related companies and foundations known as the “Additional Entities” is exerting legal pressure. In a separate notice filed Jan. 6, they told the court the receiver did not follow up after requesting documents regarding a motion to clarify the receivership’s scope. They say the receiver did not provide additional evidence or respond to the court’s questions by the court’s deadlines.
Because of this, the Additional Entities want the court to officially say they are not part of the receivership and that their assets are not included. They claim the unresolved motion has caused a “severe financial impact” by creating uncertainty for their operations and business relationships. They have submitted a proposed order that would settle the issue in their favor.
Key Turning Point at Hand
All these filings show that the Uncle Nearest receivership has reached a key turning point. The receiver says keeping information private is important for protecting value and handling tough negotiations. Meanwhile, the court is watching compliance more closely, and related groups are pushing for answers and resolution.
The judge’s decision on sealing the second quarterly report, and how the receiver answers the court’s show-cause order, could affect the next stage of the case. This includes the future ownership, structure, and possible sale of one of Tennessee’s most closely watched spirits companies.
Young wants Weaver-linked companies in receivership
Receiver: Millions in transfers, commingled finances and a surprise fraud lawsuit justifies pulling more Fawn Weaver-linked companies under court control.
Investors allege fiduciary failures
A group of Uncle Nearest shareholders has growing concerns, alleging a failure of due diligence as the company’s financial condition deteriorated.
Weavers file suit against former CFO
Uncle Nearest’s founder alleges misconduct caused financial and reputational harm and fueled a false narrative that founders were responsible for debt.
Farm Credit-Nearest Green filing deadlines extended
Farm Credit and Nearest Green granted one-week extension to respond to motion seeking reconsideration of rulings, including appointment of receiver.
Weavers seek end to receivership
Uncle Nearest founders ask federal judge to dissolve court-ordered receivership, arguing that the company is solvent and now losing sales under court oversight.
Federal judge affirms receiver’s control
Two decisive orders in the Uncle Nearest lawsuit – including striking filings by company directors – set the stage for the long-running dispute to move forward.
